(I understand maybe this is denial) but I actually don’t think they killed Charlie off for good

obsessionisaperfume:

impostoradult:

I don’t. Maybe I’m being naive, but after all the criticism they’ve come under for 1. gratuitously killing female characters 2. having no LGBTQ characters 3. repeatedly killing characters just for shock value…i dunno. I somehow find it hard to believe they’d be THIS stupid. 

Currently I’m inclined to think this death was intended to be temporary all along. And either something from the Book of the Damned is gonna save her, Rowena is gonna resurrect her for some reason or she’ll somehow be brought back to life by the Stynes. (I mean, there are even more possibilities than that, because its Supernatural, but those seem the most likely to me) I honestly suspect it will be Rowena’s doing, but either way, I don’t think this is designed to be permanent. I don’t

I just can’t imagine them pulling something like this after all the shit they’ve gotten for doing it so many times before. It just doesn’t make any sense. 

And especially with the HUGE emphasis in the previous episode that death doesn’t have to mean goodbye forever.

That was definitely Show saying WAIT YOU DON’T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION YET.

I can definitely see how they’ve set things up to bring Charlie back, and I have no doubt that they will do, but I was just as confident that we’d be seeing Bobby and Kevin again, too. That doesn’t make anything easier to deal with.