Bi!Dean meta: idk if this has been said or not, but I haven’t seen it. In s01e10, Sam was denying his demon powers and Dean says “don’t ask, don’t tell.” That, of course, was the official US military service involving LGBT personnel. At the time of the episode, this policy was still very much in effect. Thoughts? P.S. I also sent this to ibelieveinthelittletreetopper, just so you know.

postmodernmulticoloredcloak:

elizabethrobertajones:

Hi! šŸ™‚Ā 

Aw, season 1 stuff šŸ˜€ I’ve noticed that line before in this context and I think I’ve also seen people talking about it, somewhere, and I’ll go look in a moment.Ā 

There’s some good meta out there about season 1 Sam’s queercoding via abstract magic powers contrasted with the very different form of queercoding for Dean via shit he says and does and circumstances and tropes etc. They both feel like freaks, which is said on screen for both of them by like 1×06, so you have Sam who is magically different from everyone else, and Dean who just feels socially ostracised and the metaphor works on a social level instead, which makes it more directly personal to his upbringing and why he doesn’t feel he connects just as a person. It’s part of the structural subtext of season 1 that lends to a bi!Dean reading (like I was recently snarking in the tags of this post about) šŸ˜€ So I don’t think there’s any reason not to think that some sort of early bi!Dean subtext is out there in a sort of structural way which to me validates every reading of him taken off random lines and actions. And Dean going around saying stuff like that in season 1 is part of it šŸ˜›

I… I just looked through my tag for the episode and couldn’t find anything, which is really weird because I *remember* having a conversation about it and/or reading good long meta about it. The only post I could find was this one which is not only one of 2 posts dealing with bi Dean stuff in this episode (aside from some slightly larger collections), I didn’t write much myself for this entire episode and the only reason it’s mentioned here is my tags snidely alluding to it:

https://elizabethrobertajones.tumblr.com/post/137427332398/f-ckyeahfutbol-rainbofiction

I’m going to have to assume that this is such an obvious line we all just kinda don’t pay it any attention because like the one about him teasing Sam about the hotter psychic, you have to go through a few loops more than you need to with later subtext, even though it fully counts in a projection/anxiety way that Dean’s behaviour is quite predictable even by this point about in other ways.

Well I don’t think these are my own thoughts but I’m pretty sure I’ve seen it talked about vis a vis Dean’s awareness of the concept and social commentary e.g. he’s calling Sam out for not wanting to talk about it because he is trying to say he’s NOT as unwelcoming as the military and would be supportive of Sam if he’d just talk to him normally about it instead of getting defensive. Especially since Sam brushes it off as weird vibes and dreams, when he previously, in Home, was much more certain he was having premonitions and was visibly distressed and beating himself up about having predicted Jess’s death. Dean’s not stupid, he’d have been waiting to find out what Sam was hiding since 1×04 and he knew Bloody Mary’s MO so of course he knows that to Sam this is more thanĀ ā€œjustā€ weird vibes and dreams, but he’s having some serious plot-arc, thing-that-killed-Mom-and-Jess weirdness going on right now. Sam blows him off talking about it and Dean snarks at him that fine keep your secrets if you think I’m going to – well, dishonourably discharge you from the family for the truth, to finish the parallel.Ā 

Obviously Dean using the term critically means a level of social awareness to make the parallel and to use it as a negative concept. And then there’s the reflecting onto Sam, because the term obviously is *only* about being gay in the military as the first and only read you need to make of it in this context. And he barbs at Sam a lot for being feminine or gay or whatever in the early seasons, which is the negative side of the performing Dean thing: establishing that strength is one thing, that Dean doesn’t approve of these things, and that Sammy is instead, because obviously Dean’s the big manly older brother who’s never worn women’s underwear ever. Which just makes us goĀ ā€œoh honā€ to Dean and try and steer him away from all these toxic masculinity related ideas of what he should be or not be.Ā 

But anyway the projection and anxiety that you get with Dean is he says stuff but secretly he’s afraid of it and how it applies to him, and ribbing Sam like that is a fast way to reassert himself to the top of the masculinity ladder, but it turns pretty much everything he insults Sam with into an I’m rubber and you’re glue situation. Because at the heart of it Dean’s biggest issues are he’s scared and doesn’t have full control of the situation, and most of the first MotW episodes in season 1 have something or other where they absolutely expose Dean’s layers. There’s some good recent comments from @wherethewildthingswerent who watching for performing!Dean rather than bi!Dean stuff and found a whole bunch of examples in the early episodes which prove that Dean NEVER had the facade for the audience. I think 1×03 or 1×04 pretty much immediately set us up to question Dean’s act anyways, like, the first 2 episodes are the only ones which are mostly about setting up the playing field and letting us know how this all works, and as soon as we are getting the idea of it, take it all away from Dean šŸ˜›

I suppose the conclusion would be that Dean fears as much as what he’s jabbing at Sam about fearing – that would his family disown HIM for his queerness if they knew and from Sam’s POV almost the entire episode is Dean acting like John and following orders. Being HIS soldier and trying to do what John would want and earn his approval. John as their drill sergeant is something he eventually confirms to them in his own words, so the military references to how their family works, especially with John as an ex-Marine, are really important.Ā 

That entire episode has John looming over it because he sends them to the case and Sam spends the first quarter expecting to meet John there, and then realises it’s been a distraction to send them away, while Dean is determined to work the case because John wants them to, and push Sam to do it no matter what as well. Hence the big outburst, and this episode leading directly into Scarecrow where they fall out completely for Dean not having a mind of his own and Sam wanting to get revenge instead of save people blah blah… Point being the idea about Dean there is he’s completely absorbed his own personality, wants and desires into being John, which isn’t even really called out and addressed until 3×10 when Dean’s demon!Dean dream self calls him out, and it takes further long years for any serious improvements to be made on Dean expressing himself, even if he’s begun to think for himself more after mentally grappling John’s ghost all of season 2, struggling with the orders, and finally being freed from that burden when they see his ghost move on in the sense of not being *directly under orders* any more, so he’s left to figure out the rest of his life how to be his own person or scuttle back into the safety of being John (and the timing of demon!Dean calling him out on that is pretty much because it’s season 3, John is dead and ALSO gone (which were 2 different events :P) and Dean’s still stuck in these things from back in season 1…)

It’s usually time to stop when the next paragraph would be summarising the rest of the show while making anguished Dean!girl noises. šŸ˜€

—-

And although tbh this was badly stocked for this episode, if you’re wondering about bi Dean stuff in the show, I have collected this shockingly large collection of posts that you can start with – you can use the search function to skip to episodes:

https://elizabethrobertajones.tumblr.com/post/164196287338/the-dean-is-bi-meta-masterpost-full-credit-to

If I’m ever THAT bored for some reason I kinda want to change the links to descriptions of the meta but that is not currently something I am bored enough to do šŸ˜€

This kind of stuff is absolutely my jam and I’ve probably have many posts about it written by me or someone else in my blog but I am also unable to tag things decently so only thing I found wasĀ thisĀ post by f-ckyeahfutbol.

But yeah season 1 (and beyond lol) was about their different flavors ofĀ ā€˜freak’, which have been paralleled all along. I’ve been saying that the show has been paralleling Sam-and-the-supernatural and Dean-and-queerness (in a wide sense) throughout its course, and their endgames must be connected to that.

thescarletlibrarian:

rogha:

nutheadgee:

marzipanandminutiae:

fuselii:

today i learnt that king tutankhamun made sure that he had a condom with him in his next life. i never want to hear a dude say he didn’t have the time to be prepared or didn’t remember to buy condoms. if king tut had the common decency of making sure someone put a condom in his resting place alongside one of the biggest treasures ever so he could practice safe sex in the afterlife no present day dude has an excuse for not wearing condoms.

here it is

it’s made of animal intestine

and they know it was his because they found residue inside that they were able to DNA-match to him

yes, that kind of residue

My mans Tutankhamun was already busting a nut when Osiris was measuring his soul to go see his ol man Ra like imagine having such guts.

When will your fave ever?

@wardens-oath

ā€œKing Tut’s Mummified Erect Penis May Point to Ancient Religious Struggleā€

ā€œEgypt’s King Tutankhamun was embalmed in an unusual way, including having his penis mummified at a 90-degree angle, in an effort to combat a religious revolution unleashed by his father, a new study suggests […]

The mummified erect penis and other burial anomalies Ā were not accidents during embalming, Ikram suggests, but rather deliberate attempts to make the king appear as Osiris, the god of the underworld, in as literal a way as possible. The erect penis evokes Osiris’ regenerative powers; the black liquid made Tutankhamun’s skin color resemble that of Osiris; and the lost heart recalled the story of the god being cut to pieces by his brother Seth and his heart buried.

Making the king appear as Osiris may have helped to undo a religious revolution brought about by Akhenaten, a pharaoh widely believed to be Tutankhamun’s father, Ikram said.

Akhenaten had tried to focus Egyptian religion around the worship of the Aten, the sun disc, going so far as to destroy images of other gods. Tutankhamun was trying to undo these changes and return Egypt back to its traditional religion with its mix of gods. Ā 

Ikram cautions that her idea is speculative, but, if correct, it would help explain some of the mysteries surrounding Tutankhamun’s mummification and burial.

Tutankhamun’s erect penis

Tutankhamun’s mummified penis eventually broke off from his body after the mummy was discovered, at one point leading to media speculation that it had been stolen.

Ikram has yet to encounter another Egyptian mummy buried with an erection. ā€œAs far as I know, no other mummy has been found thus far with an erect penis,ā€ she told LiveScience in an email.

The imagery of King Tutankhamun’s erect penis has a connection to the god Osiris, Ikram said. ā€œThe erect penis evokes Osiris at his most powerfully regenerative moment, and is a feature of ā€˜corn-mummies,’ the quintessential symbols of rebirth and resurrection,ā€ she writes in her paper. Corn-mummies were nonhuman artificial mummies created in later periods in honor of Osiris. They were made of a mix of materials, including grain.ā€

https://amp.livescience.com/42290-king-tut-mummified-penis-explained.htmlĀ 

About anger and reality

postmodernmulticoloredcloak:

juppschmitz:

blushingdean:

mittensmorgul:

postmodernmulticoloredcloak:

thejabberwock:

postmodernmulticoloredcloak:

Now, I haven’t been around much these last couple of days because of health stuff, so forgive me if I say something that’s been said a million times already.

I wanted to throw down a thought about the nature of Dean’s show of anger, or better, about the way the scene in Mia Vallens’ studio is a play on reality.

It’s nothing new that the theme of the Dabb era is reality, and this episode has gone all out with it. Shapeshifters by definition are a monster that allows a play on appearances and lies and deception. In the first episode of the show featuring a shapeshifter, Skin, we got to explore the folds of the truth of Dean’s character. Nightshifter, Monster Movie, Ask Jeeves… all explore the themes of truths and lies and identity. But I don’t want to digress šŸ™‚ So, this episode explores heavily the theme of deception, from the obvious element of the shapeshifter pretending to be someone else, to the visual metaphors like the ridiculously highly symbolic moment where ā€œDeanā€ literally tears his face off like a mask.

And then there’s the crucial scene where Dean, Sam and Jack visit Mia Vallens’ studio and put up a performance to pretend they’re interested in her counseling service. The status of reality of the entire scene is ambiguous, and the anger shown by Dean is, let’s put it like this, ambiguously real.

I am not saying that there is no anger in Dean because that would be silly. He’s angry at God for dumping too-big responsibilities on them and disregarding their needs; he’s angry at Jack for the events in North Cove; he’s angry at Sam for ignoring the boundaries he’s trying to set regarding his role in dealing with Jack. But I think that we also have to consider that there is a level of performance to that anger shown in the counselor’s studio.

The crucial scene for the interpretation of Dean as aiming anger at his family is purposely a performance, where the line between reality and deception is ambiguous. I’d say that Dean draws from reality and uses that reality to craft a lie. That scene in Mia’s office is primarily a lie. Sam has to storm out of the room to go investigate the room (although he does take a moment to collect himself when he gets the cup of water, because the lie wasn’t a complete lie, of course), Dean has to keep the counselor busy.

Look at Jensen’s and Jared’s acting – for most of the scene, it’s theĀ ā€˜pretend’ attitude. Only one thing, in my opinion, Sam brought up that Dean wasn’t expecting and made his controlled expression slip, i.e. the part where Sam talks about him not having the connection with Mary that Dean had.

Look at this bit for instance

Most of the scene is more or less like that – they’re blatantly acting with streaks of actual feelings intertwined with that. Only at this moment Jensen does a kind of face that signals that Dean is taken aback in a hurt-y way, the blink-and-retract:

It’s not about anger at all. He slips when Sam clearly goes out from the track they had been planning the scene to go, because Dean is obviously taken aback for a moment there. (Sam is also making it harder for himself, digging actual troubles of his, and he has to collect himself with the cup of water later).

When the scene is about Dean’s feelings, he is putting on a show for the counselor. And, while he does use actual feelings to make the show (of course, otherwise there’s no point to the entire episode if everything is a lie lol),Ā Dean seems fairly in control of the persona he’s playing – let’s call it a John persona if we want. Anger, making Sam storm out of the door (sounds familiar?), blatantly drinking hard liquor, making the kid terrified of him – there is a truth to these things Dean is showing. He does hold some anger, he does mean what he’s told Sam to some degree, he has been drinking alcohol (but mostly beer), he has been acting aggressively at Jack (who, I might add, isn’t terrified of Dean, but terrified of himself – when he tells Sam that Dean said he’d kill him, he doesn’t it because he’s scared of Dean, but because he’s scared of why Dean thinks that about him).

But at the same time, Dean and Sam are playing a part. Dean makes a show of acting angry and aggressively oppositional to Sam, Sam leaves the room and go investigate (it doesn’t really matter if they’d planned it to go exactly like that – either way, they had to explore the counselor, they were there with a purpose). No matter how much truth there is behind it – Dean is still putting up a performance for Mia. He makes a show of drinking alcohol from his flask, something so blatantly ā€œI am not taking this loss well lolā€ that is sure to capture the counselor’s attention on him.

I think that his anger is real (of course it can’t all be an act otherwise the emotional weight of the episode disappears and nothing makes sense), but the John persona he puts on is something he purposely play with for a specific goal.

I think that the scene suggests that he is emotionally mature enough that he play with the anger he feels. That he can use John as a performance on purpose. Maybe it’s not a coincidence he doesn’t seem to have particular reactions to Sam’s accusations that he’s acting like John – because he’s not in a position where he’s terrified of being like John, of his emotions escaping him, of being unable to control himself. It seems to me that he’s in control of his anger towards Sam and Jack, it’s not like Lisa and Ben when he felt his emotional reactions were escaping his control and was terrified. When Sam accuses him of acting like John, Dean simply reiterates his refusal to act as mother to Jack, which is the boundary he has been trying to set and Sam has been ignoring.

This actually makes so much sense a little ping went off in my brain and I let my dinner burn in my eagerness to discuss it. Because when Sam said,Ā ā€œYou’re acting like Dad,ā€ Dean’s said,Ā ā€œThat’s a bad thing?ā€ without any emotion what so ever. He actually shrugged.Ā 

image

Dean Winchester, the dude who almost started crying when he realised he was acting like John with Ben:

image
image

It scared him to think of himself as John when it came to Ben because he chose Ben–he chose that emotional labor of being someone’s father. But when Sam says he’s acting like John when it comes to Jack, he shrugs? Why? Because he knows exactly what he’s doing. And it’s not about cruelty or anger.Ā After he nonchalantly asks if that’s a bad thing to be John right now, heĀ follows it up withĀ ā€œI’m not going to hold his hand or tuck him in at night. I’m not going to be his mother.ā€Ā 

Because he’s not going to be, to Jack, what he was to Sam (i.e.: holding his hand and tucking him in at night, doing all the emotional labor that John wasn’t willing to do when raising a child) and instead he is going to be, to Jack, what John was to Sam; the rough, hardened, drill sergeant who left it up to Dean to worry about Sam’s feelings. He is leaving the emotional labor up to Sam.Ā This is a conscious choice Dean is making. It is not irrational or fueled by rage. It is quite simply Dean drawing a line in the sand, creating an emotional boundary between Jack and himself. A boundary which he has every right to make. I am actually so proud of Dean for doing this for himself. For saying no and making something about his own needs for once. This is good.Ā 

Exactly! Sorry for your dinner. There’s also the fact that Dean… isn’t really acting like John acted towards him. He’s acting more like John apparently acted towards Sam. From what Sam has said about John over the course of the show, John was a drill sergeant type that barked orders and didn’t listen and had zero patience and sure became scary when he drank, but wasn’t nearly as bad as, say, Max Miller’s father, right? Dean’s experience of John… doesn’t seem to be exactly the same. Dean was terrified about acting like John not because he barked orders at Lisa and Ben, but because… well, slippery slope, right? Being snappy in case of danger is not bad, especially if you’re the competent one and you’re dealing with fairly unexperienced civilians. It’s the idea that the attitude could be a symptom for something deeper, for a stronger resemblance. Sam accusing him of acting like John possibly falls a little flat because, duh. If only John had had Dean stay sit in the car or get food from the kiosk. The John Sam experienced was a drill sergeant, the John Dean experienced was something darker and scarier.

*slides into the end of this post to add the reminder that, as the original post said, it wasn’t just about maintaining the emotional continuity of the episode, or making it lose all sense, theirĀ ā€œactā€ HAD to contain an element of real feelings, because they went in to Mia’s office believing that she was a PSYCHIC. They believed that, if she were a true psychic, she would KNOW if they were being dishonest with her, which is why Dean wasn’t thrilled with Sam’s plan. Luckily for them, Mia was just good at her job– and a shapeshifter and not a psychic…*

But also, Dean’s entire cooperation in bringing Jack along with them on this hunt boiled down to Sam’s puppydog eyes and his plea to do itĀ ā€œfor me.ā€ Dean capitulated, but then at every turn Sam was pulling faces at Dean’s reticence to deal with Jack at all… because Dean was upfront about not wanting to, and he’d made his feelings about being forced to not only share space in his home but now emotional labor in dealing with Jack abundantly clear.

In some ways, Dean’s attitude with Sam about his reluctance toĀ ā€œget overā€ what happened to Mary strikes me as a retaliation against Sam’s repeatedly pushing Dean toĀ ā€œjust get overā€ losing Cas, and the fact that Dean has flat-out yelled it in Sam’s face why he isn’t going to help him with Jack. And yet, Sam keeps pushing him. Even at the end of the episode Sam assumed that Dean was just ready to be okay with everything. I hope that brings the reality of Dean’s grief home to Sam, because he just hasn’t seemed to get it yet. Maybe this is what prompts Sam to suggest their hunt in the promo for 13.05… just the two of them hunting together like old times… (and what looks like some eerie callbacks to 1.10, which I am eagerly awaiting)

Reblogging this because I feel like it might help people understand Dean a bit better right now.

God thoughts in these posts.
And I was left wondering, if the ā€œtherapy sessionā€ was mostly an act (which I find pretty convincing) why is it that Dean should feel compelled to sincerely apologize to Sam for ā€œbeing a dickā€ but not Sam to Dean for being a pushy jerk?
And the answer is, of course, because Dean is just that kind of considerate, compassionate person (being a ā€œdickā€ notwithstanding). And Sam just isn’t.

Because Sam doesn’t see his behavior as wrong, he sees Dean’s attitude as unreasonable. Sam apologizes when his actions have consequences he didn’t expect/want (and the apology is about how he feels about it, because in his eyes making that mistake means he’s a terrible person and it becomes all about Sam’s feelings). When something he does turns out to be a mistake, he’s heartbroken about it and apologizes for the mistake; but he doesn’t apologize for being a dick, because what we see as being a dick Sam sees as being rational and reasonable. Dean will apologize for acting like a dick even if he was right. Dean is the one who carries the responsibility for the emotional integrity of the family, a role that was dropped onto him as he became theĀ ā€˜housewife’ of the Winchester household after Mary’s death. If a member of the family does something wrong, Dean will apologize for not having acted better to prevent the other from making the wrong thing. I am not an expert, but I’m pretty sure it’s a thing commonly found in victims of abuse, especially parental abuse – they blame themselves, they shoulder the fault. With all the talk about Sam’s experience with demon blood lately, I feel authorized in digging this thing back – at some point, the blame ambiguously hovered over Dean for leaving Sam alone because of his damnation to hell. Heck, it started before Dean went to hell, before Sam started drinking Ruby’s blood – Ruby just had to suggest it, and the big thing stopped being Dean going to hell, the big thing became that Dean was leaving Sam alone. But it’s not just that. Dean has always been apologizing for doing something wrong when he was raising Sam, but the fact that he was a struggling kid himself doesn’t touch the radar. Only Dean seems to have realized that – his speech at Mary in Mary’s head is about that – but it doesn’t seem to have reached Sam’s radar yet.

(Doesn’t seem to have reached some fans’ radar either, because for some it’s all about poor Sam who didn’t get enough vegetables growing up.)

The scene in 13×04 is about Dean apologizing for being mean to Sam, and Sam saying something that requires Dean to provide him emotional support. Eh, in-character for both. Sorry if this came off as very critical of Sam but sometimes you just gotta be.